The end of the USA

I hope you're right but I don't know. God help us if Hillary gets elected. If there is one person who could be worse than Obama it would be the Clinton crime family. Anyway, here's an article that has part of Justice Scalia's dissent...


www.businessinsider.com/antonin-scalia-slams-john-roberts-in-his-obamacare-dissent-2015-6


Justice Scalia slammed Chief Justice Roberts in his Obamacare dissent




Read more: www.businessinsider.com/antonin-scalia-slams-john-roberts-in-his-obamacare-dissent-2015-6#ixzz3eAvIwhZ6 

Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia is not happy about the Supreme Court's decision to save President Obama's signature healthcare law.



In a fiery dissent Scalia lashed out at Chief Justice John Roberts for his key vote to save a provision of the Affordable Care Act that allowed the federal government to provide healthcare subsidies to Americans in 34 states that did not set up their own healthcare exchanges.



"We should start calling this law SCOTUScare," Scalia wrote in the dissent.



This is the second time that Roberts has played a major role upholding Obama's healthcare law. In a high-profile constitutional challenge to Obamacare in 2012, Roberts was the crucial vote that helped save the majority of the Affordable Care Act.



This comment amused Chief Justice John Roberts, who again wrote the opinion for the majority. According to Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, Roberts smiled and laughed during parts of Scalia's dissent.



The case revolved around the interpretation of a phrase that stated that healthcare exchanges must be "established by the State" in order to receive tax credits. Scalia said that he was baffled that the majority of the justices could interpret this to mean that the federal government could give tax credits in states where exchanges weren't established by the state.



"Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is 'established by the State.' It is hard to come up with a clearer way to limit tax credits to state Exchanges than to use the words 'established by the State,'” Scalia said.



supreme court justices john roberts antonin scaliaPhoto by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images



The conservative justice called the logic behind the ruling "interpretive jiggery-pokery," and remarked that the Court was simply looking over the law's errors in order to save Obamacare.



"Normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved," Scalia said.



Although Scalia has been one of the most outspoken critics of the law on the Supreme Court, there's at least one area that Scalia agrees with the Obama administration — the second challenge to Obamacare shouldn't have reached the court at all.



"This case requires us to decide whether someone who buys insurance on an Exchange established by the Secretary gets tax credits. You would think the answer would be obvious—so obvious there would hardly be a need for the Supreme Court to hear a case about it," Scalia said.



Some court-watchers also noted that Scalia ended his dissent on an unfriendly note.



Scalia dissent simply ends with "I dissent," rather than the traditional "I respectfully dissent."

Honestly, isn't this who we need as a president?

www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/photos/a.488852220724.393301.153080620724/10155756407270725/?type=1&theater